Home > Hard Drive > Which Hard Disk Brand Is Best?Hitachi

Which Hard Disk Brand Is Best?Hitachi

Contents

david i've never had any issues with mechanical drives, all brands, in all kinds of configurations … only drive issue i ever had was pair of ssd developing bad sectors in Tim What I'm saying is it shouldn't be surprising to anybody that a Trending: App Dev Cloud Data Center Mobile Open Source Security Deep Dives Reviews Resources/White Papers Search infoworld Sign They’ve also been really good, but they came after we already had a bunch of the Seagate 3TB drives, and when they came out their price was higher. YevP I'm not familiar with that specific drive, but likely the NAS variants were more expensive than the drives we tried out. this contact form

The failure rate does tend to go up some after about the 3 year mark. The price for the longer warranty is worth it because it helps with predicting long-term costs. Buddy So. I'm merely telling you that a statistical report is not science and nor is a flawed statistical report. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/what-hard-drive-should-i-buy/

Most Reliable Hard Drive 2016

I just browsed here looking for something on drive reliability. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/enterprise-drive-reliability/ > Backblaze's experience with drive reliability in no way will reflect the real-world use of these drives in consumer applications. We have some of these drives running in storage pods, but are in the process of replacing them because they aren’t reliable enough. I asked the tech guy at WD what computer companies install WD drives in their products and he wouldn't answer me, its not the first time a customer has called JUST

That’s not enough data to make a decision. You do understand they do not sell hard drives, ("…one vendor does a test …") because it seems you are confused. I've had piles of dead 7200RPM Seagate Barracudas at one point. Most Reliable External Hard Drive 2016 Well done.

John You did not read my post, did you? If they started doing so, it would be a good bet that the manufacturers who were consistently showing higher failure rates would rework their production lines to ensure better QC and Hitachi and Samsung dibble and dabble into other focus area's. I wondered if you had data from OEM's on how many bad hard drives they receive?

every major manufacturer out there has had a few bad models, almost anyone reading this can say they have X brand that has lived for years with no issues and Y Most Reliable Portable Hard Drive nor those silly green drives, my guess is you never heard of NAS storage? I have a python script to scrape the failure times I need and then an R script to do the plots and test the models. Thank you.

Hgst Hard Drive

They have been rock solid, and have had a remarkably low failure rate. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/what-hard-drive-should-i-buy/ Run alongside the existing drives Backblaze purchase for use. Most Reliable Hard Drive 2016 Those that fail (3-4%) do this within the first two-three months, but the remaining ones seem to be quite stable during the following three years. Most Reliable Hard Drive Brand The warranties are void under this use case, too.

You're not being a very active reader if you didn't understand that. > No consumer-class drive is built to withstand the vibration of dozens of drives. [citation needed] > Since Backblaze weblink I asked if they did it or not. Backblaze's experience with drive reliability in no way will reflect the real-world use of these drives in consumer applications. All slides can be clicked on to enlarge them and open them in a new window. Hgst External Hard Drive

That is a serious dichotomy you find yourself in. First one was Seagate and the second one was Western Digital. It would certainly mean something if it's found that, for example, there is only a 1% annual failure rate for Seagate drives manufactured in Thailand (TK), with the remaining 15% in navigate here Damon pray tell, how does monitoring 12,000+ drives over a several year period and logging install and failure date equates to "junk science"?

Pathetic. Seagate Or Wd External Hard Drive That’s nearly 42 million days or 114,155 years worth of spinning hard drives. Now the article has been updated to show different stats.

Data from other companies that may subject their drives to different constrains than those at Backblaze and some statistical analysis of the numbers would be very useful to get a clearer

I would imagine there would be a correlation between the two: older drives surely tend to fail more. Peace Love Yep. This wasn't a mistake. Best Internal Hard Drive Brand Also, SATA 6 GB/s is what he is looking for for gaming.

and yup i am using windows pro for my own pc. I've had awful results from so-called Barebones/OEM drives from all retailers, which is why I'll only buy retail kits now, though they are not necessarily easy to find or the best In fact, because you're about the only company that is willing to disclose this sort of information, you ahve a responsibility to be crystal clear about … well everything. http://genepsd.com/hard-drive/why-does-my-hard-disk-appear-in-safely-remove-hardware.html Are RMA drives returned to the manufacturer with data on them?

Backblaze isn't a "consumer application." Yep. Of course… if you're game is (for example) GPU intensive (like BF4 can be) don't expect it to turn an entry level graphics card into a high spec one. Skip I have been bitter ever since they stopped selling those Cheatah SCSI drives Brian Emenaker Google published an extremely extensive hard drive failure report a few years back, and in I wish you good luck in finding a good statistical dataset from a scientifically controlled experiment.

TalkinHorse Historically I'd formed the concern about platter count, and that pushing to four platters and beyond was begging for mechanical failure. During Q1, some of the drive model had no failures, hence the 0% failure rate for them. Hope in future we have reliable storage with multiple option other than magnetic drive we get 10 fold speed and life span increase with theoritcally no limit on storage. Feb 26, 2013 #20 Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 6,724 +2,157 WD, Seagate, Hitachi & Samsung are all much the same, different users experience different problems & most people have a

To yourself (for failing to be honest and transparent), to customers (for giving them flawed information) and to companies (Seagate in particular, because you use subpar drives and then essentially blame The company readily acknowledges these limitations, but continues to provide its data on the grounds that having some information about real-world failure rates and how long hard drives live for is naren p Very informative article. It is statistics.

Latest posts by Brian Beach (see all) Backblaze Open Sources Reed-Solomon Erasure Coding Source Code - June 16, 2015 Backblaze Vaults: Zettabyte-Scale Cloud Storage Architecture - March 11, 2015 Reliability Data If you want to find out just how rough handling adversely effects HDD's, just order one from Newegg.com. So WD bought HGST, the best performer.